Climate

ℹ️Climate
By :	Aristotle Sabouni

1Liner  :  The Climate is always change, the debate is over the cause and consequences. Where there's no debate, there's no science.

---

Summary  :  There's evidence to support at least some of both sides points (or severity) on man-made Climate Change. There is no consensus, and science is skepticism not consensus. We need nuance, discussion, debate and enough intellectual curiosity to be open to answers that don't fit your preconceptions (Bias).

---

🗒️ NOTE:
I don't care if people believe in, or disbelieve in AGW theory: there's evidence to support at least some of both sides points. I do care that we can't even talk about it, because so many people are 100% sure that anyone who doesn't agree with them is greedy, evil, uninformed, and destroying the planet. The truth is far more nuanced.

<ul><li>Property "Image" (as page type) with input value "File:" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.</li> <!--br--><li>Property "Left" (as page type) with input value "CO2 is causing the climate to warm, we’re near a tipping point: 97% of scientists say so. And the earth is doomed if we don’t accept carbon taxes, green energy and stop using fossil fuels immediately. The Green New Deal would be our salvation. Even free speech shouldn't apply to Climate change deniers, with efforts to arrest those scientists and pundits that disagree with the newspeak" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.</li> <!--br--><li>Property "Right" (as page type) with input value "The climate is changing because it’s always changing, the models are inconclusive. Science isn’t consensus and the studies that claim consensus are junk-science. Since the climate models are undeniably broken, and CO2 has been proven not to be as much of a forcing factor as expected, we’re near an all time low in global temperature, warming has historically been good for humanity, and those screaming the loudest have a history of being wrong. We need to study more before overreacting: and fossil fuels have done more to decrease pollution than to harm us. And many famous scientists think this stuff is overblown. You don't win scientific arguments through suppression of facts/arguments you don't like." contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.</li></ul> 

Facts

• Climate History - the left uses scare tactics to try to convince people to panic and empower the government to control their lives (watermelon environmentalism like the Green New Deal). But all their predictions of doom and gloom have been wrong in the past. So it's a bit naive to think that this time they're right (and not overstating it).

Anyone with a cursory understanding of the science (including Nobel laureates) recognizes that:

1. the politicians have taken over and the Science doesn't show what they claim

3 Most think Global Warming is likely to be good for humanity and life on the planet

1. and that just about everything the Press/Public/Activists believes (or have convinced the gullible to believe) is exaggerated to the point of absurdity.

The more this goes on, the more Skeptics come out of the woodwork.

File:SJW-DebateIsOver.jpg

1970's - Climate - while the idea that humanity would destroy itself is old, in the 1970's the radical left decided that they could use the cover of environmentalism to further their Marxist agenda: gain power and destabilize the nation by telling everyone that everything they did was ruining the globe for their kids. Energy generation that worked, was bad. Breathing was bad. Civilization was bad. This watermelon movement (Green on the outside, Red/Marxist on the inside), lowered the tone because global cooling / global warming was putting the very planet at threat. So eco-terrorism, calling the other side "Science Deniers", and anything they did, was justified in their minds, because the future of the entire planet was at risk. They advocating ruining lives and careers of anyone that knew more than them and disagreed with them. Civility was a threat to our very existence.

---