Scampeachment 2.0

From igeek2
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ℹ️Scampeachment 2.0
File:Scampeachment.jpg
File:Scampeachment.jpgx
By :  Aristotle Sabouni
Created :  2021-02-12
    1Liner  : 
After their first failed attempt, Democrats tried impeachement again. By this standard all Democrats belong in prison.

Summary  : 
After their first failed attempt over "Quid Pro Quo", Democrats tried impeachement again over J6. Appearantly asking for people to peacefully protest election abuses is a high crime. Which means every Democrat that complained about any election belongs to be exited from government. (That's most of them). To Dems, it's only a crime when conservatives do it.

Scampeachment 2.0 is where;

  • the Democrats and their media promised to impeach Trump from before he was in office
  • they kept floating Trial balloons on what he should be guilty of
  • most fell flat, but a Fake Quid-Pro-Quo got a partisan vote in the house and yawns in the Senate
  • Then the Chewbacca taking selfies with Pelosi's podium was something they thought they could pin on him. And for the emotion, irrational, and those not paying attention, it could persuade them. If by persuade we mean not change their mind in the slightest on what they already believed: that Trump is Satan.
  • So they rushed a case through the house without any evidence, witnesses, any allowed defense or even a good basis for impeachment -- because they wanted the charade that "he was still in office" while impeached.
  • Then they stalled sending it to the Senate, so they wouldn't have to face any critical thinkers or scrutiny and the Senate control switched to Democrats and they could go full Kangaroo court.

The summary of the evidence wouldn't be enough to convince a Cambodian roadside hit squad that they had a case. Let's go through the evidence:

  • Oh wait, there is none. They didn't present any facts that the house had used. Because the house hadn't used any to begin with -- just straight line partisan vote to convict was enough.
  • They hacked up some videos as "evidence"... only the videos were out of context lies that would have never been allowed in a court of law. The Trump team just offered all the context was hacked out, and the total tone changed. Each clip in the video would have been disqualified in a court for omission of exculpatory evidence. Thus, there was nothing left.

Conclusion[edit | edit source]

The only people that think the impeachement(s) were justified prove they are not intelligent enough to have a political conversation wtih. I just imagine the sign language L over their foreheads and walk away.


File:GeekPirate.small.png


🔗 More[edit source]


Template:Show Categories2