1Liner
: Reasonable gun laws would have protections against these unreasonable outcomes.
|
| Reasonable gun laws would have protections against these unreasonable outcomes. There wouldn't be unreasonable prosecutions, people's lives ruined by over aggressive prosecutors. A single example disproves the ideas that gun laws (and gun controllers) are reasonable, or they would be outraged and demanding fixing/eliminating these unreasonable outcomes. |
|
Property "Right" (as page type) with input value "If that's true, then there would be no examples of unreasonable outcomes; reasonable laws have checks against abuse. These examples disprove the reasonableness of gun controllers and their laws. While they have never been able to offer any observable positive effects of their laws, or consequences when eliminating them." contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.
Examples
Template:StripCategory2 • [2 items]
- 2010.07 Todd Doering - A Lansdale, Pennsylvania, resident was arrested when he crossed the border with a gun in his car. He bougth somethihng in a (Logan) New Jersey store, but despite a right to carry in his own state, NJ didn't recognize it, didn't let him off with a warning, and convicted him to two years probation & $100 fine (until pardoned years later by Governor Christ Christie (R)).
- 2015.07.14 Elizabeth Griffith - Liz didn't know that her Florida conceal and carry didn't apply in New Jersey, so she was arrested and facing 10 years in prison for her mistake. Governor Chris Christie (R) pardoned her to get around the unreasonable law.
| 💭 What's Reasonable? |
|---|
| What is reasonable when it comes to gun laws? I explain what it takes to be compliant with a few gun laws so that readers can decide how reasonable these laws are. Now I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV, so don't take this as legal advice. But these are just a small sampling of the 20,000: local, state and national gun control laws that every owner must know and comply with, under the legal concept of Ignorantia juris non excusat (Ignorance of the law is no excuse). The penalty for infraction is often a felony conviction, ruination and loss of gun rights by hyper-aggressive DA's who hate guns or want to get elected to higher office on the fraud that they're helping public safety. Or worse, the laws aren't enforced and teach both sides contempt for them. If any of these laws seem silly, annoying, or ineffective, you will begin to understand why gun-advocates mock and resist “reasonable gun control” and the legislators who create them. |
File:GeekPirate.small.png
Template:Show Categories2
